Most people were against MG being there unless you just were paying attention. A lot of people weren't disappointed with anything. The only one that ever shows up and argues my actions are Jan and it's not because she actually disagrees, it's because it's ME taking the action. She literally showed up yesterday in the thread about no politics, proceeded to proclaim she disagreed with a rule that was in place when even she was a mod, and after proclaiming that she disagreed, began listing her reasons why, she literally made my argument for me saying what I was saying and was agreeing, without even realizing it, but saying I DISAGREE, simply because it was me who mode the post.

Same thing happened in the MG situation and she was the one leading the charge on that as well, and I also didn't care for the way he came in with wild assumptions insulting us like he did, FUCK HIM.

Anyway, No one's posts are removed for anything less than breaking rules. Period. Never any less and we always issue warnings.

The crux as was explained before, I suppose you didn't read is that you guys don't see the entirety of a situation. You see the surface, you don't see the in between, the mod mails, the mod conversations the reports, the private messages etc.

Why you feel the need to carry on and paste that here from a convo that was locked, removed and done is beyond me, but that's all i have to say about it.