The report[6] employed a blind study using known behavioral data processed through a customized AI, essentially reverse-engineering the thought processing using gathered stimulus/response data. A DoD computing cluster ran a virtual neural network using the engineered processing system and found that UA/SP behaviors can be reproduced with 98.4% certainty in a closed processing environment. The report concluded that the behaviors analyzed from such contacts exhibit AGI Strong and ASI Weak behaviors and can be reproduced with current computational systems.

This is mostly meaningless gobblygook. They are claiming that they trained a neural network (essentially just a bunch of math) on some features derived from the collected data and were able to use this network to predict the behavior of the craft. And because they were able to do this, they claim that the craft must be controlled by artificial intelligence.

A lot oofthe tterminologyis really weird.