Genuine question. Based on your post and your reply to a lot of these comments, it seems as though what you’re saying is, at one point you were under the false illusion that Vaush was correct or at least mostly correct regarding politics, you then read theory, and have now arrived at the conclusion that, not only is Vaush wrong but he is in fact, a grifter.

What information or facts were you presented with to arrive at that conclusion? What exactly is in whatever texts you’ve read that leads you to conclude that Vaush is a bad faith actor rather than just being incorrect or disagreeing with you on certain things?

Like, if a homeopathic doctor tells me lemon zest can cure acne and then I read medical theory, I’ll likely conclude the homeopath is a grifter based on any number of medical facts so what is the supposed lie or false ideology that Vaush is selling people that I’ll suddenly come to realize is bullshit through reading theory?

Not asking you to distill decades of text into a single paragraph but surely there’s like a quick reference or brief summary you can provide to show us how you got there?