Your assuming they have teams. I am saying they don't given the fact they are still adding updates while game-breaking bugs are live since forever. Facts versus your assumptions. Yes its quite funny.
The fact they have teams or not doesn't influence if the game ends up with bugs. Why can't you understand that?
What I said is their priority is still adding features even when game-breaking bugs are live which is quite evident that they are just crossing things off a list.
What features did they add during the testing phase then? Since you ignored my comment about the hair changing feature, I'd like to see you answer this one.
A lot of people quit because of those exploits when what they did for weeks was essentially meaningless.
The purpose of a test is to find bugs. Everything you accomplished would be wiped at the end anyway. All your progress would be meaningless anyway. I don't see what you mean with this.
You are assuming they have a QA team. Now not only they have a QA team, they also have a unit and integration team. I didn't know I am dealing with Microsoft here. I'm sorry. :)
Oh man thanks for making me laugh! Unit test and integration tests are done by the programmers while they write the code (or before, depending on the methedology) :)
Yes but if that were true, TOS has the most inept QA team around
Why? The closed beta test works exactly to find bugs o.O
Me too. You have no experience at all with software development. What you know is theoretical or the best "scenario" how a software company works and not what happens in reality.
It's funny you say that because the fact that you don't know what a unit test is and that you assume software has no bugs if different teams work on a project and that you are angry at bugs that happened during a testing phase tell me otherwise. It all amazes me, if you are a dev :)
I can't defend what I am saying anymore so I will just find some grammar mistakes just to make myself feel superior. Good job. :)
No, I'm genuinely questioning if you aren't understanding me because of your english or because you are stubborn, not insulting your spelling mistakes. Sorry about the confusion.
A person assuming IMC has the best system in place even though his own experience and facts is saying otherwise. A delusional fanboy indeed.
Let's correct a few things here: I'm not assuming IMC has the best system in place and I'm not a fanboy. You were trying to cause a dramatic scene because of two things:
A) Bugs during the testing phase
B) The hair color changing window being "prioritized" over A.
When you refuse to understand that:
A) The hair color changing window might have been there for months. It only appeared now because of the exploit. You don't know when it was added.
B) Bugs happen during the testing phase. That's what testing is for.
C) In software development, different people might be working on different things. If someone is adding the pretty hair color changes (they have an interface programmer according to their blog post), other people might pretty well be correcting bugs. You should know this if you are dev.
D) Even if bugs don't get fixed right away, it's okay, because it's a testing phase. They will fix them in the coming weeks/months until the next CBT / OBT.
That's the only thing where I disagreed with you. The pay-to-win bullshit is truly disgusting. But this thing you wrote about prioritizations, I just can't agree with, because it's not how it works.