Hey HBombthrow,
Thanks for your input. Couple things I want to discuss.
The part regarding the "abusive" relationship - I agree that is an abusive relationship. 100%. I even qualified that part by stating that he is an "insecure douche." He is a sociopath. He is a dirt bag. He is a shithead. BUT in the case of that scenario, SHE decided to stay with him. Every time he gives her an ultimatum, she makes the choice to stay with him. His threats are not one of violence. It is simply "Do this for me, or we are through." If it was you or me, and some douche friend or acquaintance says that to you, what do you or I do as men? We say go fuck yourself. We are through. I, and Red Pill as a whole, does not condone the behavior of that hypothetical man. The only question we raise is why do people say the man is at fault for the woman's decision to stay with him for 5 years? All she has to do is walk away. If women are not able to distinguish this on their own. If they are so "helpless" or can be "manipulated" or "felt they were compelled" to stay simply because a man told her so, what does that say about her and her gender in general?
Check out this post: The Redpill is Pro-Woman. It's great.
Regarding the hot girl, hot guy example, this is how I read your response:
That's fine to believe that, and maybe its true. But you and I will never know if she would love you the same if you were 5 inches shorter, made 210k less a year, and had 30% body fat. Until that happens, the fact that you fit the exact qualities of the dude in that example (not exactly, but let's round up), just proves Redpill's point of view.