did you really just talk about look of an equation and then get insulting, then suggest a new hobby for me?

like bro, who are you to tell me what I should and shouldn't focus on?

I love how you not seeing connections means i need a new hobby.

over-inflated position of self?

Like you said, you're a chemist. Maybe stick to chemistry instead of mathematics.

It doesn't feel right getting told what you should or shouldn't do does it?

so why do it?

the area thing is an idea. a quickly suggested one.

you can't dispute the argument of 1 neutron 1 proton and 1 electron tallying the same as the least amount of steps between a postive and negative.

protons being positive (+1), neutrons being neutral (0) and electrons being negative (-1), it makes an amazing paring.

1+1 hydrogen n(+1) (prime builder)

2n+1 Deuterium

(2n+1) ^2= helium

(2n+1) ^2+ (2n+1)=lithium

(2n+1) ^3= beryllium

(2n+1) ^3+ (2n+1)=boron

(2n+1) ^3+ (2n+1) ^2=carbon

notice how using this system, and the suggest imporance of 2/3 and 3/4, carbon shows ^3 and ^2.

(2n+1) ^3+ (2n+1) ^3=nitrogen

(2n+1) ^3+ (2n+1) ^3+ (2n+1)=oxygen

h20

[(2n+1) ^3+ (2n+1) ^3+ (2n+1)]+(n+1)^2

if using Deuterium:

(2n+1) ^3+ (2n+1) ^3+ (2n+1) + (2n+1) + (2n+1)