Wow, do you know how I know you've never taken an actual math class? Because you seem to think that math problems and story problems are mutually exclusive.

Calling it a "story problem" isn't an excuse to substitute hamfisted metaphors for argument. It is also a reason to believe you are still in high school.

You claimed that the only explanation for different averages is if there was a different cut off. I used basic math and with raw data and charts to prove you wrong.

Here is what I said: "If you don't understand what this means, draw a bell curve on a piece of paper, then draw another bell curve to the left of it. The only way you would get proportional representation with a fixed cutoff would be to change the cutoff. This is simple math."

That's all there really is to it. In your billionaire example you don't have proportional representation, which is the whole goal of affirmative action, so it isn't really relevant.