Yeah then even the nude of his mom only hurts his feelings no?

I mean if she consented to it, then yes he should have no issues. But there is proof that his mom existed. And dead. So logically she didn't consent to it.

So both are allowed, or none are.

No one can be allowed while another can't be.

People call Jayalalitha, former Tamil Nadu minister, as 'Amma' which means mother. So does that mean that she is above such insults? Does her supporters deserve the same protection from insults by haters? You cannot go and declare everything as your mother then cry that when another doesn't believe in the way you think, insults them. If Jayalalitha, whom millions revere as 'Amma' can be insulted, despite being 'Amma' to none of their supporters, then so does Kaali. If their feelings doesn't matter, same goes for hindus who doesn't like Kaali. if Muhammad, a prophet who billions revere as parent figure can be insulted and his teachings can be tore and spit upon, Kaali should not be protected from the same insults.