Yeah I don't like that make a vat human thing. Then again Ridley Scott makes some whacked decisions like those with Prometheus, I just mentioned it as I've seen it mentioned.

I assumed Deckard will be human since they left the he's a replicant thing with the written PKDick story and dropped it when they toyed with it. Rachel is absent and the actress too, so I wonder if they'll play with Leto is some next gen Tyrell rep or kid, he's been searching for some version of replicant to beat out the tough laws probably enhanced since last flick, as we can't have killer bots around, and some pleasure and holographic/simstim world replicants are mixed up with Leto's desire to transcend death and legality regarding replicants.

Due to William Gibson's Neuromancer birthing cyberpunk and much of it's influence with simulation/simstim , I'm wondering if much of what is seen in the previews don't actually physically take place and rather exist as avatar interaction, the conversation real, but not in person.

Gosling seems to know Deckard's car is going to blow up prior to it, he's taken hostage by the brunette woman, Leto says bring IT to me, not him or her, and that other brunette appears to maybe be some prophecy creative effort or dream avatar for the Gosling character.

I'm wondering if they tell Gosling, Deckard's a replicant then find it's a lie and he actually is. Question is, where's Rachel play in this? Why does the YouTube description say Gosling unearths an old secret that could plunge society into chaos?

Why did they repeat the rag tag whacky looking rando bots like the first film? Will they be so silly as to make Gosling like a child of Deckard?