You've managed make me feel sad, so thanks for that. I'm assuming this was your goal, so I wanted to make sure you were aware. Always good to get a reminder that the adult world has its fair share of childish bullies.

Just because you and I have different definitions of what "a reasonably decent grasp on physics and math" means does not equal myself being of "low ability." I do not and have not once claimed to have superior knowledge, and I most certainly am of sound, rational thought. In fact, you throwing that in my face as if you're superior shows me you yourself are likely suffering from the very effect you seem to believe I suffer from. Don't act like you know me. Among many other accomplishments, I'm a military-certified Geospatial Intelligence Imagery Analyst. Idiots aren't accepted into the Intelligence disciplines. Not like that matters as far as physics goes, but I'm just trying to get across to you that I'm no dummy.

I know I need to learn more in this area, and my hubris levels are sitting nicely at 0. I have repeatedly shown humility and have continuously stated none of my claims are to be taken as correct. Nothing Dunning-Kruger about it. Just because you have people who think they know what they're talking about running around this subreddit acting like they're better-than-thou does not mean everyone is like that. I'm genuinely interested in this topic and wish to continue learning.

What I have posed in the paper is certainly outlandish and definitely needs more work and some accompanying math, I agree with that wholeheartedly. I wrote it up before bed last night, for crying out loud. That's the entire reason I even made this post. I would like my conjecture to be met with reason. But yeah, nice job trying to write the topic off as some delusional half-assery just because you don't have any actual input.