Gawd help me but I'm back in this thread.

Yes, Trujillo's statement referred to a letter from a secret Santa. But, based on all the evidence that's been presented, in my view that was a simple, and obvious, mistake in his wording. It certainly isn't supported by the other statements about the torn up letter. (1) The visible writing on the letter had no indication that it came from a "secret Santa" and (2) it didn't refer to JBR getting a visit or post-Christmas gift from Santa. And isn't that the whole point of this "discussion?!" It certainly was for me, considering I was replying to your post about the Cooper quote which referred specifically to a card from McReynolds and with specific contents.

Perhaps I should have clarified in my response that there was no evidence of a card as described by Anderson Cooper. Because there wasn't. But I figured that was painfully obvious.

And Lou Smits was correct, there was an indication of a Secret Santa. So what? That's been covered many times. As I mentioned, JBR had told a playmate about getting a visit and gifts from a secret Santa after Christmas (although I didn't use the word "secret"). Obviously that qualifies as an indication that JonBenet had a secret Santa, but that's quite different from a letter from a specific person containing a specific message as described by Anderson Cooper.

And I don't need your fucking help to read, although it sounds like you might need some help in interpreting what you read. But, hey, thanks for the self-righteous passive-aggressiveness (there's nothing humble in any of your posts).