Yeah. Sorry I deleted that comment due to the fact that I didn't mention that age of consent in Britain is 16, so unless he was younger than that, it actually wasn't even illegal as far as I know. I keep forgetting Milo is a foreigner considering how much time he spends in the U.S.

But yeah, he mentions a sexual relationship with an older priest when he was a teenager and joes that he was the sexually aggressive one who liked to seek out older men because it made him feel good/powerful/whatever. The interviewer immediately starts pushing that Milo was molested, and Milo says he enjoyed it, that priest is the reason he gives good head, and ultimately makes the oh you've never seen a 16 year old and thought that they were hot joke.

Basically it's problematic to me on two fronts.

A) Because if he was 16/17, then it was legal in Britain, and we shouldn't really view it from an Americanized lens.

B) Even if we are playing the he was molested card, then that's even worse. If someone is going to take an interview in which he (by your/your country's standards) was molested and twist it to somehow blame Milo, that's pretty messed up. A few news outlets I watched described it as talking about "relationships between boys and men" in order to make it sound like maybe Milo was the adult fucking teens. Really twisted.