There is so much wish-washy bullshit with this case, it's staggering. Just trying to connect the dots of authentic culpability with these perps is completely exhausting in itself - it's just more of the same blurred obfuscation. They bury the "real" associations deep in the articles, which are nothing more than walls of text with buzzwords and MSM terror keywords. And even then, those associations are weak on their own.

On an Interpol "terrorism" list, Khalid is suspected of having rented a flat under a false identity in the Forest district of Brussels that was raided by police on March 15." source

So "police" raided the suspect's flat before the attacks? weird (and fishy). Not to mention when "false identity" is part of the police tale.

"Turkey said it had detained Ibrahim in June last year as a "foreign terrorist fighter" and then deported him to the Netherlands, but that Belgium failed to confirm his links to terrorism." source

So, again, wtf is the correct storyline here? Two of the three had been long-term wards of the state (prisoners) up until just recently. Then, boom, somebody with a fake identity gets "raided" and no proof or links can be found in retrospect to anybody other than recent prisoners with weird messages left on computers saying "hunted everywhere" and that it's not safe anywhere. Again, 100% nonsensical to the "story" we are supposed to believe.