Even more accurately they’re saying that any ban on any firearms sales to 18-20 year olds is unconstitutional because 18-20 year olds were required to be members of the militia and equip themselves with their own arms.

They explicitly state that the most comparable rights to the 2A are the 1A and 4A, and that we have those from birth. Therefore, the 2A must vest in full at least by age 18 which is the age of adulthood.

The judge was so based they even mention the hypocrisy of the government allowing 18-20 year olds to use the “most sophisticated weaponry” of the military to protect the nation, while insisting that same 18-20 year old can’t be trusted to purchase a handgun from a dealer to protect their own home.