Are you interest in insults or actual conversation?

I’ve asked you how you go from volatility to risk and you deflected that.

50 years of research? For or against? Markowitz got a Nobel prize. So did Kahneman for behavioral finance which debunks “rational” investor.

Fine if you like to insult me by calling me a cosplay head of equity. What about Buffett who wrote at length against MPT? He literally said “you are better of not learning beta and MPT”.

I don’t think debate should based on titles or personal insults.

Let’s go by facts. You are for MPT? Start by explaining how you go from price volatility to risk? What assumptions did you make there?

Or are you going to just throw off another insult?