You have a penchant for both stating the obvious and going on tangents.
Whether you like it or not, no one is obliged to answer your questions
I have no preference or expectation. The reason I was asking questions was to get to a common understanding - something you refuse to do. That's on you, leave my disposition out of it.
Whether people should care about JINN or not, does it really matter if they don't?
No. We are all free to care about the things we choose.
I Just think you overstated the need to care about JINN
I disagree that I'm overstating anything. I made one throw away comment to OP - then several follow up explanations to you. You're actively refusing to understand where I'm coming from, and I'm starting to feel trolled. Surely, you can't be this hard headed.
I didn't say people 'need' to care about JINN - I said they would if they understood what IOTA is trying to achieve. The computational speed and energy efficiencies that come with ternary hardware will be massive drawcards to IOTA technology for IoT. Before the Samsung announcement, we knew that JINN was likely to be the hardware solution for IOTA. Caring about the success of a group who are developing ternary hardware SPECIFICALLY FOR IOTA is something people invested in IOTA would (by implication of global application) care about. I don't care if they do or don't, it's just my opinion. I don't know how many different ways I have to spell this out for you.
I have a feeling English is your second language.. so I'll break it down:
People invested in IOTA should know what they’re invested in, and if they do, they’d care about JINN."
I used 'they'd' they'd is a contraction that is used interchangeably with 'they would'
Similar to this:
vs
I know it's nuanced.. but can you see the difference?
Jinn != IOTA
Never said it did.
So maybe relax on lecturing people on how much they should or shouldn't care.
It's ridiculous how you keep trying to take an authoritative stance and tell me how I should conduct myself. I'm not lecturing anyone by telling them what to do, or how they should behave, I simply gave my opinion with a statement. Quote me. Show me where I've told people what they should be doing.
Your approach is to set it up like I'm doing something I'm not:
badgering people about how they should or shouldn't care about JINN is counter productive
Wrong. I said they should know about IOTA.
and then
maybe lighten the tone and lessen up on the absolutes.
Your approach is predictable and boring. You've brought nothing of value and have a style of communication that is anything but conversational, in fact, you try to dilute the other person's opinion by trying to taint their character and telling them to 'get in line'.
I think when this kind of behaviour is brought the attention of people who act in that kind of way, they'd benefit from some self-reflection.
Now leave me be.