The law you posted has nothing to do with your claims. The people of arizona voted in specific campaign finance changes just last year. You don't want their votes to matter, because you hate democracy. You don't care what the people think, and think that those on your side should be able to break rules voted on by the people if the state if you don't like them.

You're unwilling to condemn christian fascists forcing their religion on others, but ARE willing to condemn people who are trying to keep criminals from violating campaign finance laws. Just like you law in the face of child abuse victims, and mock people who have their rights stripped away by republicans.

It's very sad you scream "fascism" for being expected to follow transparency, but yet won't even condemn people who force a backwards, pedophilic religion on others while threatening to blow up everyone they disagree with.

I agree though - we shouldn't allow the discussion to shift to other things. Seeing as this is a pennsylvania subreddit, I will no longer acknowledge any attempts by you to attempt to bring up other states in order to attack people from pennsylvania, that have nothing to do with the topic at hand.

The topic at hand being - literally anything would be better in office than a republican for pennsylvania, seeing as republicans refuse to vote to protect things like marriage rights.