Forget your petty arguments below because now you both look like idiots. Nobody cares about your anonymous ego.

Can you find anywhere that I've suggested that we should ignore everything else's Westbrook had ever done? I bet you can't.

Do you understand subversion? It tends to be the most popular 'counter-argument' to "circle-jerking" on reddit.

Here's how it works: We say we hate Russ for how he handles the media. You don't defend Russ instead you remind us that the media isn't innocent. Despite this not being a perpendicular (direct) form of dissent, you're essentially shifting the narrative in a way that better suits any pro-Russ rhetoric (god forbid). So we make the assumption that your goal IS to shift the narrative BECAUSE you like Russ.

While the assumption could be incorrect, your comment history doesn't matter. On reddit if you understand shilling or multiple accounts you should know that it's very easy to manipulate the conversation. And I doubt you're unaware to this tbh. I'm trying to understand how your comment directly relates to the one you replied to and it's just sideways, the person had one line saying something about the media.

You wanted a pro Russ comment, that's what your goal was. Try making a more direct comment next time, or don't I mean it has positive karma so whatever.