Which Linux myths would you like to see debunked?

Perhaps, I misread you, I said the corporations don't want you to use it, because they like to sell information but maybe we are both wrong, some care, some don't. The wifi driver was it under an open source license or proprietary... I would be surprised if it was. but it is possible. Gnome in my opinion sucks. Systemd has caused crashes for me when I installed arch, otherwise you may be right. Why do you use fedora then? or windows 10 both are nightmares in their own way. One sells information like crazy and the other isn't very stable in my opinion.
Chromium is never really off hence why it boots quicker. by the way, I use waterfox and noscript. and noscript is awesome as long as you set certain settings into play, like allow globally dangerous scripts. If you get annoyed by scripts being blocked all the time and having to enable and disable them... I used windows since 95 to 8.1. that's when I mostly stopped. Although, I find it strange you are getting defensive/attacking me. I was just trying to figure out what went wrong. That is all. Firefox does suck and so does chromium. Waterfox is far faster and more secure. Tell me something, any thoughts about waterfox? Waterfox removes a lot of bad stuff from firefox. eme still is an option if you need it though. Systemd on the other hand, you are right, I am no doubt clueless about. I would prefer you talk to experts about, like the devs from devuan. I am not qualified to understand completely. I just have heard terrible things about security bugs in systemd... that's about it. Anyways though, no need to flame me.

/r/linux Thread Parent