This is so weird. The title just says inappropriately touching. That can be anything. It doesnt have to be sexual. But this thread is just like 70 comments of people saying imagine if the roles were reversed. Why? What does that scenario have to do with this? Justice was served, she was told to simply leave his vicinity which seems pretty in line with what she did. We know that if a man grabbed a womans chest, the consequences would be worse. But right here, they didnt need to be worse tho. All of the pitchforks and shit, like come on. The dude stood up for himself. She was told no. Looks like a win to me. The person being perpetrated against got to set the pace of the retaliation and it was lesser than if disney had made that call. He didnt have a handler throw her out of the park and he could have. This weird hate boner that hot women can do whatever they want. Apparently not. Heres the video evidence. Its like even when a woman takes an L, commenters have to mental gymnastic their way into “the woman still has the upper hand and must pay!” And to the people saying if the roles were reversed, sexual assault isn’t determined by where they’re touched. It’s determined by consent. You can also totally sexually assault someone without touching them. So imagine if a guy did this to a womans chest. Okay. Why? Are womens and mens chest equal? Apparently it depends on whose chest it is and what they say. If you think women are not felt up daily and literally just walk it off, you’re living in a fantasy world