This 26-year-old grad student didn't really debunk Piketty, but what he did do is just as important

This is an automatically generated TL;DR, original reduced by 93%.


The student in question, Matt Rognlie of MIT, has published a paper titled "Deciphering the Fall and Rise in the Net Capital Share" that adds valuable depth and context to the discussion on wealth that Piketty inaugurated.

The nexus of the good story, the heavy politicization of Piketty, and the fact that almost nobody actually read Piketty's best-selling book have also opened the doors to confusion, and helped create a misimpression that Rognlie debunked the book's core findings.

In his book, Piketty very clearly and expressly uses the term capital as an exact synonym for wealth.


Extended Summary | FAQ | Theory | Feedback | Top five keywords: Piketty#1 Capital#2 wealth#3 Rognlie#4 housing#5

Duplicates found in /r/urbanplanning, /r/Economics, /r/economy, /r/TrueReddit and /r/POLITIC.

/r/urbanplanning Thread Link - vox.com