So first off nothing I write is a personal attack or trying to be insulting but hopefully emphasises the issues.

Overall I think you don’t really address the question with your answer.

So to be critical, you make statements with no explanation then make a random list of statements to do with general Protestant theology (it looks like you’ve read a list of general Lutheran beliefs and regurgitated them) and then an explanation of who Jesus was out of nowhere.

The mention of Jesus at the end seems weird. I don’t think your teacher needs reminded of who Jesus was if this is a history or RE class.

So assuming this is important in some way since you posted here, I would start again.

I’d read the basics of who Constantine and Martin Luther were. I would look at what their interactions with Christianity actually were. I’d look at their different life circumstances.