Funny how these articles never mention some of the things Mr Thompson said. Like this:

I want to be absolutely clear that I believe vaccines have saved and continue to save countless lives. I would never suggest that any parent avoid vaccinating children of any race. Vaccines prevent serious diseases, and the risks associated with their administration are vastly outweighed by their individual and societal benefits.

Or this:

I have had many discussions with Dr. Brian Hooker over the last 10 months regarding studies the CDC has carried out regarding vaccines and neurodevelopmental outcomes including autism spectrum disorders. I share his beliefthat CDC decision-making and analyses should be transparent. I was not, however, aware that he was recording any of our conversations, nor was I given any choice regarding whether my name would be made public or my voice would be put on the Internet.

So this poor man comments on the fact that he felt that data showed a slightly higher rate of autism in an certain subgroup is recorded without his knowledge and made the poster-boy for a movement he does not support. While he felt the data is statistically relevant, he clearly does not think it has any impact on whether or not anyone should get the vaccine.

Funny how these articles also ignore the fact that this study is one among many, and that no connection between the MMR vaccine and autism has been found over and over and over again

For all the raging this sub does against the "mainstream media", at least they exist enough in the public eye and have competition following that they are forced to maintain journalistic standards. Sites like this, or natural news, or globalresearch etc. hold themselves to none of these standards. They exist to misrepresent in order to further their cause, and they pander to a niche that fucking loves them for it.

If you actually want to fight corruption and corporate manipulation use facts, not propaganda from the other side.