Implying that if it's about something which is frowned upon, then it is justified to not give informations related to it. That sounds much like censorship to me. Do you "honest players" not also frown upon censorship? And what does the opinion of what is ok and what is not ok of some (even if those are the majority) people have to do with answering questions? Especially a single player game with no score/leaderboards. And why do you guys assume it is not relevant just because it's frowned upon? Do you have stats showing how many people use ACs and how many don't? I'm sure it's not just like 1% but much more. And if that's the case, then it IS relevant for THOSE people. Can't they have answers for playing the way they enjoy playing the most? Doesn't matter if it's the majority or minority of people.

I mean, it's not like I want to know from you how to make a bomb (which is "frowned upon") so I can blow up a bank, and you don't wanna tell me that. This would be totally understandable. But we're talking about a single player game...

I know at first read I might sound triggered. But no, I'm not accusing you of anything. I just got annoyed at the fact that it seems that if you do things that are frowned upon, and won't conform to what is considered "ok", "normal", then you're seen as inferior, unworthy of attention (exagerated, but to get the point through). Hey if you think about it, it's the same reason why scientists were killed during the Middle Ages (and even now its pretty much the same, though we don't call people who oppose the consensus reality witches and wizards, but lunatics and crazys, and we don't have the inquisition but we have a government that deals with them through jails, asylums etc. ANYTHING to maintain the status quo of rich and poor people(which I "frown upon" xP)).

Thanks for your quick answers! :D