I'll have to assume you're right on that, since the only source I saw cites an "unreleased 2015 survey," I'll have to also assume that you agree that there were "2.5million 'DGUs'"
It's literally the second sentence of the article. This is why you're getting downvoted, because you can't be pissed to read.
And if you read/understood my reply at all you'd know that automatically assuming I'd agree with 2.5 million DGU's is wrong.
Furthermore, what's the method of verification? It's 4,000 ANONYMOUS people regarding an issue that has no database. Like most pseudo-intellectuals, it seems like you think if you're extra verbose and aggressive, that alone will give your argument merit. Unfortunately that's not how it works lol.
Like most pseudo-intellectuals, it seems like you think if you're extra verbose
In other words I said a bunch if things you didn't understand so now you're going full anti-intellectual. Empty platitudes and broad unsupported generalizations is all you can handle I guess.
You're a living embodiment of the Dunning Kruger effect.