My first point is that the two backs break tackles at the same rate, which, as you can see, is factually correct.
On a per-carry average, given half the actual touches, and with a greater quantity of those missed tackles forced as a receiver as opposed to traditional rushing. In an offense that philosophically would never have featured him as a fulcrum. For all of one year.
Yes, that I can see.
From that point, I make the point that breaking tackles, and RB play in general, is largely overvalued in evaluating a run game.
Coincidentally, it's where you lose me.
I would not necessarily agree there is less talent along our offensive line this year.
It's hard to be a difference maker at guard, and everything else was a crapshoot.
There's something to be said about the organization-level commitment to the run, even late into scary games like the Championship round, but does that success come from their confidence in that strategy, or in Lynch to deliver year to year the way somebody like Richardson just never will?