Hahahaha! You apparently didn't read what I said: I stated I was not seriously associating the two events as "I... was being silly." Furthermore, "I didn't offer a rhetoric", "I merely tried to avoid a silly question", and "this was just a lapse in communication... due to laziness". Again, I did not try to associate the server crash and my experienced lag; I was being lazy, silly, and didn't offer a rhetoric... With that in mind, I was not "desperate (sic) to prove my point that I went out of my way to associate events that have no correlation." That's a straw man's argument as a foundation and an attempt to strengthen with a poor man's ad-hominem - by insulting my intelligence and suggesting I was desperate to win a void off topic argument (despite not offering a rhetoric!) You didn't understand what I said - which is fine I rushed - so you focused on something completely irrelevant to the conversation then tried to accuse me of a lie, quesitoning my intelligence, and suggested I was desperate. Ironically, suggesting I am desperate is an ad-hominem, thus you provided a very desperate refute.
"(I'm not sure why you even felt the need to post this)" location was important context to dicussing the events of the disconnection for the video game; to establish that a highly paid IT professional assisted me in understanding it was not on our end. It does not bear well for you that you cannot understand that. Also, the foreground was required to stated that I am on a very broad and diverse internet connection.
In hindsight, I mentioned my employment as you were trying to be condescending and rude to a staff member of an Ivy League university, a co-founder of a multi-student scholarship program for underprivileged low SES families, a director of a crowd funded think tank specialised in public social justice orientated statutory interpretation, a PhD candidate, a masters degree holder, and an exceptional laws tutor since the age of 17 years of age. Don't bother replying as I will not read any reply from you - your latest response was amusingly ignorant, obtuse, and very ironic.
:)