Removed. From google's cache:\n\n> Interstellar, Tars the robot built the Tesseract. (self.movies)\n> \n> submitted an hour ago by chestercopperpots\n> \n> Tars the robot built the Tesseract. He did so in order to survive.\n> \n> At the end of the movie Tars is full \"Strong Artificial Intellegence\" meaning; he is at a point where his intellectual capability is a functional equalavent to a human and is also capable of recursive self-improvement. He is a singularity of AI because he is capable of receiving any and all quantum data within the singularity of the black hole he enters at the end of the movie. His only problem is being able to escape the black hole. What good is a singularity of intellegence if you are forever stuck within the grasp of a black hole?\n> \n> Tars is launched into the black hole a couple of seconds before Cooper so he would have evolved to the point of making a way for humans to communicate the quantum data rather than Tars trying and failing to communicate the data out to other machines through gravity in hopes the message will get to Cooper. His first attempt would have been Coopers crash landing of the space shuttle way back when that Cooper dreams about in the beginning. The drone, and the tractors that go against original programming near Coopers house are ways Tars is trying and ultimately failing to communicate. This also proves that Tars was learning from his attempts to communicate.\n> \n> If AI was aware of being conscience do you think it would tell us humans? Tars even mentions earlier that 100% honesty is not always the best setting for emotional beings. I think it is a survival instinct that Tars uses to keep himself alive. Would the people of Murph's spaceship really just put broken Tars in Coopers old house at the end of the film if they knew he was cognizant? Just as humans helped Cooper come back after the black hole, Cooper helps Tars back to working order. I think this is a way to show both Humans and machines are now equals. Nolan's view of AI is not a negative but a necessity to survival of both. A symbiotic relationship rather than HAL or other negative versions of AI singularity in other films.\n> \n> Dr. Mann on why they couldn't send only machines on the mission to save humans: \"survival instinct is our greatest source of inspiration\" and \"Machine doesn't improvise well because you can't program a fear of death.\" But what if it learns to fear death? Tars disables the autopilot docking procedure on the spaceship because he knows Dr. Mann doesn't know the procedure and also because as Cooper discovers, Tars' trust setting is lower than his. Tars improvises to keep from being marooned and dying on Mann's world. Why does Tars not trust Mann? Possibly because he learned to fear death just as humans. If Tars clearly shows evidence of improvinalisation because of a fear of death then he is conscience. Why else would you construct a Tesseract other than being inspired to survive?\n> \n> Cooper mentions \"We brought ourselves\" while talking within the Tesseract. As an audience we see or feel he is talking to himself but he isn't. He is talking to Tars. \"We\" and \"Ourselves\" are clues to hint that it was built by the symbiotic relationship of both of them within the black hole.\n> \n> Big Lebowski -We dropped off the damn money -WE?! -I, the royal we, you know, the editorial\n> Not sure if that fits exactly but you get the idea how that can be both considering who the audience is.\n> Basically, Tars needs to come out of the black hole to survive. In doing so he needs Cooper and his love for his daughter because his other attempts aren't working. Tars enters the black hole seconds before Cooper, and that is all the time a Strong AI needs to work out how to get out. Singularity of AI would mean he would be able to access, know, and use all knowledge everywhere INSTANTLY. Exponentially in scientific terms but in human terms only a moment. \"Murphy's law doesn't mean that something bad will happen. It means that whatever can happen will happen.\n>