This is kinda what gets me. if killing is ok. then why is torture not ok?

if torture is not ok . then killing should not be ok.

and if killing is not ok. what about the billions of plants we let die of thirst every year?

so i see anyone who refuses to eat animal matter due to "moralistic concerns" a hypocritc.

as we can make enthaol crude crude oil. thus no plants that are a live have to die to make food for humans anymore.

https://www.reddit.com/r/askscience/comments/o4l9g/does_crude_oil_have_consumable_calories/c3eceit/

so anyone who eats plant matte . kills plants to maintain themselves when they could choose not to kill things to live!

I think we may if people actually choose to spend the time and effort to do it. create synthetic versions of all our food without killing or requiring anything living.

if you watch a plant follwo the sun i say that is some level of intellegnce. and killing intellegetn things that canb track the sun is "morally wrong"

I am ok killing things, as i feel killing humans is acceptable. we have plently of murderes it would be more pleasant to turn them to steaks than keep feeding them untilthey die naturalyl to avoid accidentally killign an innocent human.

If it is ok to kill then it must be ok to kill. killing plants is no different than killing humans. any "vegan" who chooses to value the life of animals over plants give me the right to value my life above their life. I should eat vegans as i eat lettuce!