No you're dodging because you're wrong. You proved yourself wrong with the proof you posted. The combo still works. The only way it doesn't work...is online where the exploits you hypocritically said were legit, were also being exploited.

All legit uses of the coupon are still available...so grats for proving my point. You claimed the coupon no longer works on combo's...you're own proof contradicts that.

I mean let's go back to the beginning.

The exploitation of the coupon led you to say

"Thanks to people like you, we got the coupon killed from being used online for in-store pick up. So now the coupon won't work on combos anymore and certain items that are actually above 50 dollars."

That's your argument...plain and simple...everything else that i've proven you wrong about is kinda moot.

this is the issue.

But you have yet to prove the assertion you made first.

As I said...on the contrary you've proven the combo's STILL work...and you were hypocritical in multiple ways from recognizing in other threads that the deal g3258+z97 board only worked online (gee wonder why..because it was an exploit by not having either item be >$50 to qualify) and suggesting here that it was a legit use of the coupon.

You have YET to prove the combo's don't work which is your original point.

You claimed the new coupon was worse because of very specific reasons that you haven't proven. Namely:

Coupon doesn't work on all items that are above 50 dollars. Coupon no longer work on combos. Coupon no longer stacks with other deals/coupons.

Which of these three original claims have you proven and where?

None of them from what I can observe...you have just tangented and been wrong about several things...from claiming it was the first time i'd used the coupon...to claiming I didn't have proof that it'd been mentioned here...and numerous other claims that you were proven wrong about...definitively.

You then said you made an assumption about why the deal was killed...you haven't provided proof that slickdeals killed it. Not empirical proof. Just conjecture...which is not proof.

It's no more proof than as I said: A mother suggesting her sick baby was healed by an invisible deity because she just got done praying to him and her baby is now healed.

It's simply not proof. You can say "oh it's not proof enough for you but it is for me" but that's just pathetic. lol you know it's pathetic.

So if you want to talk original points..let's stick to the original posts. Which you haven't yet proven.

GG try again scrublet