I checked out this subreddit because I like to hear both sides of an argument, since just listening to one opinion is like living in an echo chamber.

However, if your intention is to provide a counter-opinion to TRP, I feel that you are doing a disservice by using a few of those 'examples'. Some of the things you link to are just blatantly wrong. I was reading your exhibit headlines and trying to see the opposite TRP point-of-view in the stories, and my eyes jumped to exhibit "O" Wife with cancer is indifferent to husband's toochache. Should he divorce her?

That sounds bad, so I click the link to see for myself and... it's wrong. Upon clicking the link, I read that the wife doesn't have cancer. Furthermore, the collective opinion of the TRP subreddit is that the poster is being a whiny fool.

I click the next link to example "P" and... it's a post that was downvoted to 0. The top reply even says "Quit torturing your wife".

I move on to exhibit 'Q'. MeRPer emotionally distresses his wife because she views their finances as shared. I read the story, and it sounds like their relationship was fine, and his spouse learned to be responsible with their money. How is this 'ruining relationships'?

I'm not convinced that viewpoints opposing TRP have no value, but these posts you have presented do not help your case. If anything, they are so incorrect that I can't help but wonder if you are satirizing yourself.

In the end, I wonder if you don't have your own confirmation bias. Because when you misrepresent others and screenshot controversial/downvoted posts as evidence, I can't take it seriously, even if there are some pieces there that are worth looking at.

tl'dr: Your compilation could use some culling because it's full of garbage that doesn't support your viewpoint.