The potential interference on Matthew’s go-ahead goal.

The salt is so real.

"We" are not talking about anything. "You" are talking about this specific case and "I" am asking you where the rulebook has been the entire series. It's not a take, stop being an idiot.

But because you're clearly not smart enough to figure it out, i'll help you understand why it was not GI.

1) From the overhead angle, it seems like Hyman is over Rask because he is off balance but his feet remain inside the crease. He doesn't touch Rask, hence why on the replay, Rask doesn't make a single movement, whince, or anything regarding Hyman

2) Once Rask realizes he is WAY out of position and there's no way of him getting back, he puts his arms up in protest. He wasn't getting there, and there's been many cases (unless you haven't watched hockey long, which would make sense) where the referees take into account whether or not the goalie could reset/was in a position to make the save. Rask was not.

So yes, I do feel better.

/r/hockey Thread Parent Link - streamable.com