Objectively, I disagree.

That means "I believe it is a fact that Windows is better than Linux." That's what "objective" means.

What you're doing is called "moving the goalposts."

I said Linux is better.

You said you disagree.

I give reasons why it's better.

You, for your own convenience, append "for me!" to your argument.

I'm not the one who has resorted to cussing and name calling. You've replied to almost every single comment I've made in this thread, defending Windows. I'm saying Linux is, objectively, overall, superior to Windows. You've argued with me every single time I've said that.

Better for you? Sure. (Not being sarcastic.) I've conceded it's better for some people subjectively for their use cases. The only thing I've claimed is that Linux. Is. Objectively. Better. because it is. Isolated personal use cases don't have a place in objectivity.

I am not an elitist. I use the best tool for the job, which is very nearly always Linux. I'm not OP, making an entire post to bellyache about Linux users. I was called out because of my demographic, and I'm here defending myself, and you're the one attacking me.