Here's the thing. Drunk or not he was conscious. She was not. He took action. She was unable to take any action.

They are both guilty of being stupid, but he holds more of the blame because he committed a crime against a defenseless person. Their level of intoxication doesn't change the fact that a crime was committed.

It's not a illegal to get pass out drunk. But it is illegal to do illegal shit when you're drunk.

Do we went to send the message to women that sexual assault is just punishment for getting too drunk? That we just can't control ourselves and have to touch that pussy when we drink? Is this what alphas do?

Ok she went looking for some dick. Fair enough. That's the whole purpose of the party. I get that. I'd like to think that she would have a right to choose which dick she wanted. A drunk girl can still be repulsed by a man she doesn't want. But she'll fuck one she likes even if she regrets it later.

Oops! She passed out. Colossal fuck up. Are you saying that she has now consented to everyone at the party? Many states define rape as penetration of any kind. I despise false rape claims, but she wasn't even conscious. It's pretty clear who's wrong here.

If you through your own poor judgement, passed out in a gay bar, should you be okay with a thumb up your ass? Yeah it's dumb to get drunk at a gay bar, but does that make your asshole fair game?

He got 6 months. That's not a lot of time. Did it occur to you that the reason why the sentence is relatively short is because of her share of blame for irresponsible behavior? The feminists are appalled that it's so short.

Let's at least agree on one thing. It's not cool to do bad things to people who are unconscious. Stupid bitch or otherwise. They might be dumb hypergamous whores, but even whores are human. Basic human rights still apply.