And you think that a language close to Urdu can't be understood by Hindi speakers? Really?
Well,they insist on it being different.However whats your point?
So?
The premise that 40% of Indians speak Hindi is false.At best its just 25%.So your argument that HIndi has higher penetration is false.
Have about the Government of India act?
Act that made INdiadirectly under rule of crown instead of a company
As an Anglophile
I do?A hindiphile like you seem to have no problem with colonialism
Colonialism is defined as the forceful control and imposition of a culture which is separated by at least separated by one ocean. Britain was separated from India by the Atlantic and the Indian ocean. Which ocean separates UP and Karnataka?
Nice attempt redefining colonialism
Don't use words if you don't know as to what they mean.
SO do you
The first, second and third republics were all Democratic,so i don't understand as to which History book are you looking to. The only non Democratic period was chiefly the Vichy France. That's it.
Yeah I know you are not the brightest of the lot to understand France=/=French colonies
Easily throwable.
Most of the human rights atrocities are done by one country on another.You are insisting on it being done on its own people.You are not the brightest of the lot to learn from history I guess.
Why shouldn't i talk about the American occupation of the Phillipines? Because it doesn't serve your argument well?
When did I told you not to?Oh & when did I say America count as a proper democracy?
Every state has a law like that. Regardless,its wrong of the BJP to do so.
Whatever you are comfortable with.