sure thats your assumption. you don't have evidence to confirm this tho

I'll say this once again. Family members share the maximum amount of DNA, then relatives, then other members of the same species, then related species, then everybody else. DNA is used to determine how close two individuals are. It is a scientific fact, which is why DNA tests exist. If you don't believe that DNA similarities point to common ancestry, how would you determine if you parents are indeed your parents?

it's the same with evolution, we have data and we look at that data and draw conclusions. and since science is naturalistic by default it dismisses all explanations besides natural ones.

And what other explanations exist?

cool so then it should be easy to find a a lot of evidence that leads to this conclusion true?not evidences like "we share a lot of dna with chimpanzees, therefore im just gonna assume we share the same ancestor",

Sure, early human behaviour and migration patterns have been resembling that of apes, hundreds of thousands of fossils of species close to the last common ancestors of humans and apes have been found (which share physical features of both apes and humans, tells us that first gorillas split off, then chimpanzees, then humans, also tells us WHEN AND WHICH primate species went extinct due to to radiocarbon dating), cranial volume similarities, morphological and anatomical similarities, fossilized footprints and even fossilized poop. The fact that a chimpanzee has the mental and emotional capacity of a 4-year old is literally more than evidence enough that humans have evolved from apes. Combine this with the fact that we share 98.8% of our DNA with it, which you're denying for some reason.

and because i believe the quran is true i believe what it says about adam being created from clay.

Cool, which proves my point. You're denying reality to be a Muslim.