You're all over the place. This is cute.

Furthermore, why did you have a problem with my statement then?

Well, you cried so I helped you understand.

and the articles you posted (really only one article since the Forbes article is just repeating the same claim)

Forbes did an article on the story. They sourced and credited populartechnology because they got the scoop. That's how it works.

No shit. I didn't say otherwise. I'm saying that despite you posting two articles, the reality is that it's just one source: the popular technology blog. It's not two independent sources of information, it's one source (the blog) and another repeating the same claims (the Forbes article). That's an important distinction to make. I didn't say Forbe didn't cite their source or anything like that. You made that up.

I never claimed two independent sources and I made the distinction for ya. Also, made up?

Only after you tried to dismiss my sources by calling them propaganda without evidence,

Are you saying the data is false or has been tampered with? If so, please post evidence.

What you - and the authors of those articles ("populartechnology", Hah)

No, you asked for evidence and I gave it. You dismissed my source and cried. Only then did I address Cook's site being shady.

The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, also known simply as the "PG", is the largest daily newspaper serving metropolitan Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States. It has won six Pulitzer Prizes since 1938. Maybe you should sue them....

My information is from investigative journalists who interviewed scientists whose papers Cook claimed he used. But out of the 10,000 plus papers only 41 support Cook's assertion that humans have caused most of it.

Keep lying and crying, babyboy.