Never heard of him but I looked up the what is a woman and I don’t see what’s wrong with it. He’s just being a skeptic, which is absolutely fine with me in any area, science, religion, medicine, morals…. How is it a “hit piece” when everybody gets their say and answers his questions? If they can’t answer because they don’t understand or pretend they don’t or engage in circular reasoning it is they who provide the “hit”…. I don’t consider myself a “phobe” of any kind and I don’t deny anyone their bodily autonomy and right to self-identify etc. etc. and would certainly oblige if someone asked me to call them by a certain name or pronoun, but what happened to respect for skepticism and simply asking probing questions of authorities (who in this case definitely consider themselves authorities or they wouldn’t sit down in front of the camera) and others?