Euthanasia (like abortion) is an active intervention to what was “naturally” intended, and done so to destroy a life.

But there are scenarios where euthanasia (and abortion) is the most humane choice available, even though it’s uncomfortable - where there is no potentiality for life anymore, the end result will be the same, but a medical procedure can end the suffering sooner for the recipients .

I’m arguing that the anti-abortion crowd don’t care about these same kinds of cases as they might with cases where euthanasia is applied. They fall back to their all-encapsulating statement that abortion is murder and murder is wrong, with little exception.