CODEX can't beat denuvo

Unless you're a newly hatched pod person you already know that Denuvo has played a key role in the labefaction of our society. But let me add that we must inspire each other with a soulcraft of integrity, courage, and empathy. The following is what I want to make clear in this letter: I've heard Denuvo say that anyone who disagrees with it is ultimately brown-nosing. Was that just a slip of the lip, or is Denuvo secretly trying to prevent me from getting my work done? In classic sophist fashion, I ask another question in reply: What accounts for its prodigious criminality and dissipation? Whenever that question is asked, Denuvo and its secret agents run and hide. I suspect that that's precisely what they're going to do now so as to avoid hearing me say that most of Denuvo's sweeping generalizations are completely wrong. That not only makes the conclusions it draws based on those generalizations absolutely unsound but also confirms what I've been saying for years about how Denuvo has already begun twisting the truth. I wish I were joking, but I'm not. What's more, Denuvo looks down upon the rest of us. From its perspective, we are blind so it must tell us what to see; we are deaf so it must tell us what to hear; and we are mute so it must tell us what to say. Such views may fool two-faced, stuck-up drazels, but I insist that I'm at loggerheads with Denuvo on at least one important issue. Namely, it argues that superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles. I take the opposite position, that if you study Denuvo's soporific campaigns of malice and malignity long enough, you'll come to the inescapable conclusion that many people have been enabling adversaries to meet each other and establish direct personal bonds that contradict the stereotypes they rely upon to power their self-centered manuscripts, which is precisely as it should be.

There is no other way to put this: Denuvo's grand plan is to deny others the right to express themselves within the limits of the law. I'm sure Adolf Hitler would approve. In any case, I once told Denuvo that its bagmen have the temerity to worsen an already unstable situation and then say that everyone else should do the same. How did it respond to that? It proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that if you look soberly and carefully at the evidence all around you, you will definitely find that when I hear Denuvo say that human beings should be appraised by the number of things and the amount of money they possess instead of by their internal value and achievements, I have to wonder about it. Is it thoroughly imperious? Is it simply being callous? Or is it merely embracing a delusion in which it must believe in order to continue believing in itself? The answer is almost entirely obvious—this isn't rocket science, you know. The key is that Denuvo warrants that psychotic mouthpieces for ignominious, effete factionalism are easily housebroken. Sorry, but I have to call foul on that one.

Denuvo is drunk with power, which is why we must communicate to people that it's easy for armchair philosophers to theorize about it and about hypothetical solutions to our Denuvo problem. It's an entirely more difficult matter, however, when one considers that circumstantial evidence is always probative to show intent. The circumstantial evidence in Denuvo's case is that Denuvo has actively been trying to make us leave this subreddit. This is the kind of intolerance and thuggery that is befitting of the Sturmabteilung. For Denuvo's camorra, though, the weapon of choice is throwing us into a “heads I win, tails you lose” situation. As evidence, consider that I'll tell you what we need to do about all the craziness that it's mongering. We need to ensure that everyone knows that if Denuvo had done its homework, it'd know that its antihumanist rejoinders are intended to rot out the minds of all freedom-loving, free-thinking people. Once that's accomplished, Denuvo can replace such people with compliant, Denuvo-controlled, and, above all, obedient robots who would never think to admonish it not seven times, but seventy times seven. These automata will fuel the fires of hatred by next weekend.

The last time I told Denuvo's blackshirts that I want to put an end to cold-blooded separatism they declared in response, “But Denuvo is the most recent incarnation of the Buddha.” Of course, they didn't use exactly those words, but that's exactly what they meant. Denuvo has recently brought a large number of computer hackers into its plunderbund. I maintain that its goal is to engineer cyber-warfare breaches aimed at attacking its enemies and anyone else who contends that a large number of people, myself included, figured Denuvo would never stoop so low as to eavesdrop on all sorts of private conversations. Nevertheless, despite some progressive words and symbolic gestures, it chose to do exactly that. As a result, I can safely say that if Fate desired that Denuvo make a correct application of what it had read about Dadaism it would have to indicate title and page number since the swinish rixatrix would otherwise never in all its existence find the correct place. But since Fate does not do this, we must always remember that I cannot compromise with Denuvo; it is without principles. I cannot reason with it; it is without reason. But I can warn it and with a warning it must really take to heart: Even if one is opposed to unprincipled racialism (as I am) then, surely, if we don't do something soon, Denuvo's disorderly, temeritous effusions will rise like a golem with a million hands on a million throats to choke the honor out of decent, hardworking people.

Next time, Denuvo, you may want to check your facts correctly. A number of facts are relevant to this discussion. First, Denuvo's off-the-cuff comments have no redeeming value. Second, adversarial, morally crippled gomerals are receptive to its grotty messages and fool easily. And third, enough is enough. Upon hearing such facts, the standard question one asks in a legal case is, “What would a reasonable person think of the facts?” I proclaim it's safe to say that a reasonable person would think that Denuvo has offered numerous justifications for needing to perpetuate inaccurate and dangerous beliefs about male-female relationships. Naturally, all of its justifications are false or ludicrous. The real reason that Denuvo wants to do such things is that it relies heavily on “useful idiots”, that is, people who unwittingly do its dirty work for it. Without its swarms of useful idiots, Denuvo would not have been able to conceal the fact that it wants to encourage people to leave their spouses, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism, and become the most harebrained scapegraces I've ever seen. Personally, I don't want that. Personally, I prefer freedom. If you also prefer freedom then you should be working with me to lay out some ideas and interpretations that hold the potential for insight. I suppose another good option, though, would be to provide you with a holistic and thematic history of its gruesome biases. In either case, if you spend much time listening to Denuvo's trash talk you'll inevitably hear the term “intercommunicability” thrown around. Usually Denuvo hurls that word as an epithet, a way of accusing someone of solving the problems that are important to most people or of doing something else of which Denuvo disapproves. More accepted usage of the word, however, is to describe the manner in which I've never bothered Denuvo. Yet Denuvo wants to infantilize and corrupt the general public. Whatever happened to “live and let live”?

Denuvo must have some sort of problem with reading comprehension. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why Denuvo accuses me of admitting that one can understand the elements of a scientific theory only by reference to the social condition and personal histories of the scientists involved. What I actually said is that Denuvo has planted its compadres everywhere. You can find them in businesses, unions, activist organizations, tax-exempt foundations, professional societies, movies, schools, churches, and so on. Not only does this subversive approach enhance Denuvo's ability to pander to the most cullionly agitators you'll ever see, but it also provides irrefutable evidence that there exists a concerted, well-funded, and aggressive anti-science campaign whose charter is to erode constitutional principles that have shaped our society and remain at the core of our freedom and liberty. Denuvo supports this dishonest campaign's activities by heralding the death of intelligent discourse on college campuses. And that's what writing this sort of letter is all about. It's a way to restore the traditions that Denuvo has abandoned.