I was commenting on the fact that you completely ignored the most important piece of information in the article that would give any reason for a SWAT team. It was about more than just a phone, but you only mentioned the phone. If you did read the article then that is very misleading. If you didnt read the article, I was providing the information you were missing.

The article also makes it clear that the warrant should never have been approved by a judge for the obvious reason that they had no proof nor reasonable evidence that any stolen items where in that house. That's a good reason what there would be zero reason for a SWAT team, but you only mentioned the phone which is from the title of the post/aticle.

Also, You're right, i will be okay, and its fine if you disagree. What lead you to believe that I would not be okay with someone having a different opinion than me? What does this have to do with me and why are you changing the subject towards a personal attack based on wild assumptions about someone you dont know?