He really likes to walk his audience all the way up to the edge of a seriously fucked up idea…and then back off before committing to it fully so he has plausible deniability and can say he never actually pushed for that idea.

Like when he said the Army doesn’t have any use for people below 80 IQ, and so we can extrapolation that society has no use for people with below 80 IQ. So it seems like he’s doing an argument for eugenics, but then at the end he’s like “Well it’s a hell of a problem, but what can we do about it?”

Huh, I wonder of your audience has ideas of what could be done about that. Maybe they’ll fill in that blank? And maybe you know they will?