Do you feel you can account for the everyday experience of most men?
You said 'feel' rather than 'think', which already shows that you are operating from the level of emotion rather than logic.
We don't have to account for the experience of most men, they do it for us and we for them. TRP wouldn't exist if there wasn't a clear pattern to intergender dynamics.
There are enough people who don't fit neatly into your viewpoint here that it is not a valuable measure for your daily life.
The exceptions do not disprove the rule nor are they relevant, the moment you have to argue a rule with an exception is the moment you prove the existence of the rule.
The very science of psychology, marketing, and social dynamics is based on the very notion that All People Are That Way, ergo it follows that men and women exhibit gender specific behaviors that are observable and verifiable.
If you cannot understand how AWALT, then you need to read the sidebar and digest the information properly before coming at us with NAWALT.
Your thinly veiled white knighting is devoid of any substantive rebuttal, considering that the immense knowledge base of TRP was acquired via the direct experience of a statistically significant majority of men over generations that contradict your own.
Similarly, a comment on the internet isn't going to re-write the personal histories of most RPers that can vouch for every principle espoused here. This is what we've been through, not what we speculate.
Whether you like it or not, women can be put into a box of traits. If I say that women have a womb; I don't have to semantically account for those who have undergone a hysterectomy.
Finding an idea offensive is not evidence or proof that it is wrong.
My suggestion is that you thoroughly digest the information and data contained not only within the sidebar but the top field reports.