No it was the same report, but using the next part of the chart you got your numbers from showing past 12 months instead of lifetime. Same with the 2012 report, using lifetime data is skewed due to the changed definition of rape in lifetime.

But if you're doing past 12 months, that decreases the sample size and you have to address the fact that men who were sexually assaulted in the last 12 months might be more likely to participate on the study. The conclusions I'm making are based on the conclusions from those same studies, not parts of it.

Saying all men means all men, that is basic linguistics. The fact this can be seen as controversial means we can't even start from an understanding of language. This is as I showed the equal to us disagreeing on what 2+2 equals.

The issue is exactly that this post isn't saying all men. This post is literally saying "If there were no men on earth, I would be able to walk around at night topless". That's it. It's not saying that most men are a threat, it's saying that most threats are men. This post is saying 1+1=2, you're sayin 2+2=4, both correct, but you're not actually addressing the point.

If I were to draw a Venn Diagram, it would be a huge circle for men, a small circle for violent criminals, and most of the small circle would be inside the big circle. And even THEN, there is also the issue that women would feel safer around a female violent criminal than a male violent criminal, because it's way easier to defend yourself against someone your own strength, as long as there are no weapons involved.

Defending the idea that all men are dangerous is why I will continue to label you this.

I'm not.

We should not be judging a group based on the actions of a minority yet that is extremely common towards men. When this attitude is taken towards any other group it is seen as hateful or abusive. When you can stop propagating this same hate I will stop believing you have that same hate as well.

I agree.

You only use objective data when it supports the above attitude. When it does not you want to give excuses for it. This is why I keep bringing up the example of black people and the disproportionate amount of crime.

I'm literally getting data from the studies you sent, and they're still supporting my view. You actually thaught me something valuable today, that "reverse rape" is considered "made to penetrate" when it should all be called rape. Other than that you have literally only sent data that supports my views.