Define where I am wrong?
Alright sport.
Since other people constantly post how wages have been flat since then, and how manufacturing has left the country, you are incorrect.
Except that wages, adjusting for inflation, have been flat, at least since 2007.
The liberals and progressives rob the middle and lower classes, with inflation.
Inflation is not an inherent result of the Democrats' fiscal policy.
It is, when the democrats are essentially bigger govt progressives. And the democrats and left are now protecting the fed central bank from Rand Paul.
There's no data to prove that inflation is more a result of either party's policies.
It is when it's institutionalized.
The liberals and progressives rob the middle and lower classes, by stealing their wages for welfare.
Except that poor people aren't robbed for welfare, they're often beneficiaries.
Demands for higher min wages prove you incorrect.
The cost of all taxes is unfairly laid upon the middle class in regressive tax schemes, such as those pushed under Reagan and W. Bush, where the main goal is to reduce the tax burden of the wealthy (note: there is no data to show that a decrease in taxes for the wealthy leads to statistically significant increased spending).
The middle class will always bear the brunt. Especially after you kill the golden goose rich.
The liberals and progressives rob the middle and lower classes, by stealing their wages for Bailout welfare.
it was weighed against the possible alternative of financial collapse for a lot of Americans and the loss of millions of jobs.
Thank you, for the validation.
Whether it was successful or not is now essentially a slap-fight for academics, and the biggest travesty of the whole thing is that while it did, theoretically, help avert a second Great Depression, the gains had since are almost entirely to the top 1% as Congress has not made any substantial shift in economic policy.
*Actually, the rich getting richer is because of our PROGRESSIVE PAPER FIAT... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hx16a72j__8 *
The liberals and progressives rob the middle and lower classes, by stealing their wages for QE economic welfare.
QE exists to prevent rampant inflation and protect the buying power of the less-wealthy members of society.
Printing money out of thin air costs people. If it does not, then they should end taxes and just print for govt expenditures.
Your statement is a contradiction. The entire point of QE is to help the people you're saying it's robbing.
Except you already said we've been hurting since 2007! Try and keep up with your own arguments!
I am looking at the costs. Kludge or not, if you double the people on the system, the costs double.
This is flat-out wrong. This statement makes a naive assumption that the cost scales linearly with headcount.
I'm not interested in further debating selfish people wanting to steal from their neighbors, neighbors already hurting to pay their mortgages, so they can get free and subsidized HC.