I did, and your argument is virtually no argument, you repeated what I already said. Do you have any reading comprehension issues?

the map also proves. That's a simple logical fallacy.

The map proves nothing. It provides no correlation to causation, only a pile of disjunct data, so your claim that I am arguing the map proves anything is actually quite wrong. I'm claiming the opposite. That it proves nothing.

Your argument is simply a "it might not work" which is the equivalent of some scared child standing at the high end of a diving board not going in, besides the fact that your original argument was that to make it legal did not solve the issues of sex slavery.

As I stated before in my last response, human trafficing is a separate issue from prostitution. Although some slaves are used for sex, many are sold for domestic positions or underpaid wage slavery. Tackling the organized crime of slavery is not contingent on whether or not prostitution is legal or illegal, however, I think there is a strong argument against punishing women who come to the police to report being pimped out or that their pimps raped them. Or punishing Johns for that matter, for reporting that the women they went to see were clearly traffic-ed. Which is EXACTLY WHY the Nordic Model you hold so dear is such a fuck up.

Sex work is not wrong. Nor is being a customer of sex work wrong. Nor is making those things legal something that HINDERS stopping crime such as sex slavery. (Again read before what I said regarding FBI incentives) And there has been a lot of compelling evidence that the Nordic model that you so dearly hold on to, is a step backwards in progressive society. It's why many many human rights groups do not support it. Making any part of prostitution criminal, be they the customers or the sellers, protects and makes profit for organized crime.