While that first paragraph is true, what it shows clearly shows the true story.

It’s directly focused on AI art, not just using technology. And it never shows her using AI art, only drawing on paper, then with a tablet at the end. If she did find success in AI art, it would have shown that, but it didn’t; it just showed all the hardships she’s went through to become an artist and continues to go through as an artist; and then she’s scared when it shows the AI art stuff. The title also says, please appreciate the work of human artists, of which using AI art would be going against that title.

And whole situation against AI art isn’t against AI art as a whole, it’s against the fact that it steals human artists work without they’re consent, plagiarism they’re work.

And when interpreting a piece of art, before trying to make an argument on what you think it is, you should find some backround info first (the artist, the current AI art situation, etc).