Is public outrage similar to a temper tantrum?

Which means they CHOSE to listen to him because they CHOSE to not simply refund him and remove it.

Because they like money, I'm sure.

Can't use his own words? Wonder why, it might be because they don't say that at all.

Oh darling. https://forums.obsidian.net/topic/74461-controversial-limerick-discussion/page-25#entry1631723

Sorry, artistic integrity doesn't mean other people can't talk about your art.

Never said that, stop shoving words into my mouth. By all means talk about the art, say it's the worst most offensive piece of garbage you've ever seen, do not imagine for a second you have the right to demand the artist changes it to conform to your tastes. That is my point.

Apparently not important enough to learn what it actually fucking is.

Says the one that doesn't understand the difference between critique and pressure? Adorable. Your projector is on again, best go turn it off.

I didn't realize we were going to act like gibbering morons. If you want to think they're lying because they did something you don't like, go ahead, just please don't say something so stupid to defend it.

If facts and likelihood are stupid, I am absolutely the most stupid person on the planet right now. Must be because I'm not just listening and believing. /s. Glad you included we though, here I was worrying I'd be the only one. <3

And they could just refund him. Meaning they still hold ultimate control.

But they didn't, meaning they don't.

Because the devs decided to give him that decision

He paid for that guarantee. It wasn't by their grace, they made a promise and were forced to uphold it or refund him.

Because you're incapable of understanding it apparently.

Topping on the cake. You just admitted you have an incomprehensible double standard that I can't understand. Congratulations, I guess understanding the problem is the first step to changing it.

/r/AgainstGamerGate Thread Parent