I can't speak for anything other than my opinion, but I spent a few hours this afternoon at the mall trying on an assortment of Rolex, Breitling, Omega, and Longines models, as it's time to expand my collection beyond the one serious watch I own (a Panerai, let's avoid re-litigating that scintillating discussion from a few days ago). It was the first time I'd seriously handled Rolex or Omega watches and evaluated them for possible purchase; previously I've seen and admired them, but this was more focused. I'm planning on making at least two or three major watch acquisitions this year, and went to the mall with the idea that maybe I'd get both an Omega and a Rolex within the next six months or so. Here are my thoughts (emphasis so no one thinks I'm making blanket statements) on the Rolex vs. Omega question you raised:
Ultimately all of this is about opinion/taste/personal preference. All I can say is that my opinion of the Rolex vs. Omega debate changed significantly after spending a good bit of time examining and trying on multiple models of them. In my opinion (don't flame me, folks, it's an opinion) Rolex blows Omega out of the water (ha!) when it comes to materials, finishing, and presentation.