I'm not trying to prove anything. You're carrying on a conversation, I'm replying to you. That's how conversation works.

Further, I didn't even imply that I was better than you. In fact, I specifically said I was equal to you in that we're both bad at this game. But you want someone banned by virtue of not being good at this game, which inherently implies that you think they are worse than you. I'm not putting words in your mouth. "Bad player should be banned" is your only talking point. "They make their teams lose." Well, so do you... that's my point. How bad does a player need to be in order to be banned? Where is the skill cutoff that justifies a player's eligibility? Are you above that line while this player isn't? It's nonsense and it's not enforceable.